Can I run Mistral Large 2 on NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada?

cancel
Fail/OOM
This GPU doesn't have enough VRAM
GPU VRAM
48.0GB
Required
246.0GB
Headroom
-198.0GB

VRAM Usage

0GB 100% used 48.0GB

info Technical Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada, while a powerful GPU, falls short of the VRAM requirements for running Mistral Large 2 in FP16 (half-precision floating point). Mistral Large 2, with its 123 billion parameters, demands approximately 246GB of VRAM when using FP16 precision. The RTX 6000 Ada only provides 48GB of VRAM, resulting in a significant VRAM deficit of 198GB. This means the entire model cannot be loaded onto the GPU simultaneously, leading to out-of-memory errors. Furthermore, even if techniques like offloading some layers to system RAM were employed, the performance would be severely impacted due to the much slower transfer speeds between system RAM and the GPU compared to VRAM, negating the benefits of the RTX 6000 Ada's powerful CUDA and Tensor cores.

The memory bandwidth of the RTX 6000 Ada, at 0.96 TB/s, is substantial but irrelevant in this scenario because the primary bottleneck is the insufficient VRAM. Even with high memory bandwidth, the GPU can't process data it can't access. The large context length of Mistral Large 2 (128,000 tokens) further exacerbates the VRAM issue, as processing longer sequences requires more memory for storing intermediate activations and attention weights. Consequently, running Mistral Large 2 on the RTX 6000 Ada without significant modifications or workarounds is not feasible.

lightbulb Recommendation

Given the VRAM limitations, directly running Mistral Large 2 on the RTX 6000 Ada is impractical. Consider using quantization techniques like 4-bit or 8-bit to significantly reduce the model's memory footprint. This might allow the model to fit within the available VRAM, but will likely result in a noticeable reduction in output quality. Alternatively, explore cloud-based inference services or renting GPUs with sufficient VRAM (e.g., A100, H100) to run Mistral Large 2 without compromising performance. For local execution, investigate model parallelism, where the model is split across multiple GPUs, although this requires significant engineering effort and specialized software support.

If you choose to attempt running a quantized version locally, prioritize using an inference framework optimized for low-VRAM scenarios, like `llama.cpp` or `exllamav2`. Be prepared to experiment extensively with different quantization levels and batch sizes to find a configuration that balances performance and memory usage. Monitor GPU utilization and memory consumption closely to avoid out-of-memory errors. Note that even with aggressive quantization, the performance will likely be significantly slower than on a GPU with adequate VRAM.

tune Recommended Settings

Batch_Size
1-4 (experiment to find optimal value)
Context_Length
Reduce to 2048-8192 tokens initially to conserve …
Other_Settings
['Use GPU layer offloading if necessary, but be aware of performance impact.', 'Enable memory mapping to reduce VRAM usage.', 'Use a smaller model variant if available.']
Inference_Framework
llama.cpp or exllamav2
Quantization_Suggested
4-bit or 8-bit (Q4_K_M or Q8_0)

help Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mistral Large 2 compatible with NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada? expand_more
No, the RTX 6000 Ada does not have enough VRAM to run Mistral Large 2 directly.
What VRAM is needed for Mistral Large 2? expand_more
Mistral Large 2 requires approximately 246GB of VRAM in FP16 precision. Quantization can reduce this requirement.
How fast will Mistral Large 2 run on NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada? expand_more
Without significant modifications like quantization, it will not run due to insufficient VRAM. Even with quantization, performance will likely be significantly slower compared to GPUs with more VRAM.