Can I run Gemma 2 27B (INT8 (8-bit Integer)) on AMD RX 7900 XTX?

cancel
Fail/OOM
This GPU doesn't have enough VRAM
GPU VRAM
24.0GB
Required
27.0GB
Headroom
-3.0GB

VRAM Usage

0GB 100% used 24.0GB

info Technical Analysis

The primary limiting factor for running large language models (LLMs) like Gemma 2 27B is VRAM. This model, even when quantized to INT8, requires approximately 27GB of VRAM to load and operate. The AMD RX 7900 XTX, while a powerful GPU, only offers 24GB of VRAM. This 3GB deficit means the model, in its current configuration, cannot be fully loaded onto the GPU, leading to a 'FAIL' compatibility verdict. Memory bandwidth, although substantial at 0.96 TB/s, becomes less relevant when the model cannot reside entirely within the GPU's memory.

Furthermore, the absence of dedicated Tensor Cores on the RX 7900 XTX means that the GPU will rely on its general-purpose compute units for inference. While these units are capable, they are not optimized for the matrix multiplications that are central to LLM processing. This can lead to slower inference speeds compared to GPUs with Tensor Cores. The RDNA 3 architecture offers some optimizations for AI workloads, but these are unlikely to fully compensate for the lack of dedicated hardware acceleration in this specific scenario.

Without sufficient VRAM, the model will either fail to load, or the system will attempt to use system RAM as overflow, which drastically reduces performance due to the slower transfer speeds between system RAM and the GPU. This would result in extremely slow token generation, rendering the model practically unusable for real-time applications.

lightbulb Recommendation

Given the VRAM limitation, running Gemma 2 27B (INT8) on the RX 7900 XTX is not directly feasible without modifications. The most practical approach would be to explore further quantization techniques, such as Q4 or even Q2, to reduce the VRAM footprint of the model. Additionally, consider using inference frameworks that are optimized for AMD GPUs, such as those leveraging ROCm, to maximize the available performance. Unfortunately, even with optimization, performance will likely be significantly lower than on comparable NVIDIA GPUs with ample VRAM and Tensor Cores. If possible, consider using a cloud-based solution or a GPU with more VRAM for optimal performance.

Another approach is to explore techniques like model parallelism, where the model is split across multiple GPUs. However, this requires significant engineering effort and specialized software support. For most users, exploring aggressive quantization is the most accessible path. Also, be aware that even if the model loads, the context length might need to be reduced significantly to fit within the available VRAM, impacting the model's ability to handle longer inputs.

tune Recommended Settings

Batch_Size
1
Context_Length
2048 or lower, depending on quantization level
Other_Settings
['Enable memory mapping (mmap) in llama.cpp', 'Experiment with different thread counts', 'Monitor VRAM usage closely to avoid out-of-memory errors', "Utilize AMD's ROCm platform for potentially better performance"]
Inference_Framework
llama.cpp, ROCm-optimized frameworks
Quantization_Suggested
Q4_K_S, Q2_K

help Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gemma 2 27B (27.00B) compatible with AMD RX 7900 XTX? expand_more
No, not without significant quantization. The RX 7900 XTX has insufficient VRAM to load the INT8 quantized Gemma 2 27B model.
What VRAM is needed for Gemma 2 27B (27.00B)? expand_more
The INT8 quantized version requires approximately 27GB of VRAM. Higher precision versions (FP16) require significantly more, around 54GB.
How fast will Gemma 2 27B (27.00B) run on AMD RX 7900 XTX? expand_more
Performance will be limited by VRAM and the lack of Tensor Cores. Expect significantly slower inference speeds compared to NVIDIA GPUs with comparable VRAM and Tensor Cores. The exact tokens/second will depend on quantization level, context length, and optimization efforts, but it will likely be too slow for real-time applications without aggressive quantization.